Gospel and law Contrast or continuum? The hermeneutics of dispensationalism and covenant theology Daniel P. Fuller

By:

Material type:

TextLanguage: 0 eng Publication details: Grand Rapids, U.S.A; William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company; 1980Description: 217tr; Paperback; 21cmISBN:

0802818080

Subject(s):

Law and gospel

DDC classification:

230
D184-F96

Summary: The purpose of Fuller’s Gospel & Law is to argue against the notion of antithesis between Law and Gospel and to make a case for the fundamental continuity between Gospel and Law. According to Fuller, both Dispensational and Reformed theology posit an unbiblical discontinuity between Gospel and Law. He states that, “although today’s dispensationalism explains the relationship between law and grace in wording that is different from that of covenant theology, there is not substantial difference in meaning.

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings
Cover image	Item type	Current library	Home library	Collection	Shelving location	Call number	Materials specified	Vol info	URL	Copy number	Status	Notes	Date due	Barcode	Item holds	Item hold queue priority	Course reserves
	Sách	Thư Viện Cơ Đốc									Available			TVCD-5820

The purpose of Fuller’s Gospel & Law is to argue against the notion of antithesis between Law and Gospel and to make a case for the fundamental continuity between Gospel and Law. According to Fuller, both Dispensational and Reformed theology posit an unbiblical discontinuity between Gospel and Law. He states that, “although today’s dispensationalism explains the relationship between law and grace in wording that is different from that of covenant theology, there is not substantial difference in meaning.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.