01554nam a2200325 a 450000500170000000800200001702000300003704100080006708200080007508200130008310000220009610000110011824500340012924500560016324500190021926000110023826000290024926000090027830000110028730000290029830000090032752006080033665000420094465000300098685600770101691100340109395700140112799900170114195200700115820260119071345.02024-04-17 14:45:07  a0268008973, 9780268008970  aeng  a170  bW899-P32  aWoodward, Paul A.  eEditor  aThe Doctrine of Double Effect  bPhilosophers Debate a Controversial Moral Principle  cP. A. Woodward  aU.S.A.  bUniversity of Notre Dame  c2001  a317tr.  bpaperback, illustrations  c23cm  aA collection of essays from leading philosophers, provides a clear, in-depth introduction to this controversial moral principle... According to this doctrine, an effect that would be considered morally wrong if it were the intentional outcome of an act, could be morally permissible if it were the unintended effect of that act, even if it had been foreseen. As a method of drawing moral distinctions between intentional and unintentional evil, the doctrine has had a long history. It has often been employed, for example, in debates about ""just war"" and the kinds of acts that are permissible in war.  aAbortion -- Moral and ethical aspects  aPhilosophy -- Good & Evil4 uhttps://data.thuviencodoc.org/books/14360/156190151-140.jpgyCover Image  aNguyễn Phước Nhân  a231010TKH  c14211d14211  00104070aTVCDbTVCDd2026-01-20g0.00l0pTVCD-14211v0.00yBK