01961nam a2200325 a 450000500170000000800200001702000150003704100080005208200100006008200130007010000230008310000110010624500210011724500210013826000100015926000280016926000090019730000110020630000280021730000100024549000250025552010680028065000430134865000440139185600660143591100320150195700150153399900170154895200700156520260119071510.02024-10-14 11:31:19  a0865541973  aeng  a226.3  bP351-D25  aPeabody,  David B.  eAuthor  aMark As Composer  cDavid B. Peabody  aU.S.A  bMercer University Press  c1987  a216tr.  bHardcover, Illustration  c24 cm  aNew Gospel Studies 1  aStudents of the “Synoptic Problem” have long been concerned about the composition of the Gospel of Mark. Whether one believes that mark is the major source for Matthew and Luke (and, perhaps John) or that Mark as copied from Matthew and Luke, all agree that the author of Mark complied and edited-in scholarly terms, “redacted”- the materials from the Jesus tradition that were available in his time and place. David Peabody, in an intricately detailed analysis, proposes to circumvent the usual circular studies by developing a method that “presupposes no particular solution to the Synoptic problem” and “employs minimal presuppositions about ‘redactional passages’ within the gospel.” His study seeks to collect and display systematically the “potentially redactional features of the text of mark as a whole” and to isolate the “redactional features” within that larger body of “potentially redactional materials” that he believes, “have the highest probability of coming from the hand of the author/composer of the gospel.”  aBible -- Mark -- Criticism, Redaction.  aBible -- Criticism, interpretation, etc4 uhttps://data.thuviencodoc.org/books/15578/33.jpgyCover Image  aHuỳnh Thị Ngọc Bích  a231010 TKH  c15429d15429  00104070aTVCDbTVCDd2026-01-20g0.00l0pTVCD-15429v0.00yBK