Adam in the New Testament <subTitle>Mere teaching model or first historical man?</subTitle> </titleInfo> <titleInfo> <title/> </titleInfo> <name type="personal"> <namePart>Versteeg, J. P.</namePart> <role> <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm> </role> </name> <name type="personal"> <namePart/> <role> <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm> </role> <role> <roleTerm type="text">Author</roleTerm> </role> </name> <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource> <originInfo> <place> <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">8:5</placeTerm> </place> <place> <placeTerm type="text">New Jersey</placeTerm> </place> <publisher>P & R</publisher> <dateIssued>2012</dateIssued> <issuance>monographic</issuance> </originInfo> <physicalDescription> <extent>67tr.</extent> <extent>Paperback</extent> <extent>22cm</extent> </physicalDescription> <abstract>`One challenge to biblical authority is our understanding of Adam. Freshly translated, this acknowledged modern classic defends the historic church position that all human beings descend from Adam as the first human being. Given the recent debates about the existence of Adam, this vigorous defense of historical Adam is relevant now as it was when first published in Dutch. The exegetical and theological issues remain the same today. Versteeg shows with vigor and cogency that the New Testament's teaching requires a historical Adam, and his defense deserves the attention of all who are interested in the question.`</abstract> <note type="statement of responsibility">J. P. Versteeg</note> <subject> <topic>Typology (Theology)</topic> </subject> <classification authority="ddc">222.11092</classification> <classification authority="ddc">J11-V56</classification> <recordInfo> <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">1</recordContentSource> <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">2021-1</recordCreationDate> <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20260119070401.0</recordChangeDate> </recordInfo> </mods>