01163nam a2200265 a 450000500170000000800200001702000150003704000060005204100100005808200080006808200130007610000220008910000110011124500190012224500870014124500210022826000240024926000430027326000090031630000110032530000140033630000090035052005190035965000190087820260119070402.02021-11-22 14:08:57  a0802818080  a1  a0 eng  a230  bD184-F96  aFuller, Daniel P.  eAuthor  aGospel and law  bContrast or continuum? The hermeneutics of dispensationalism and covenant theology  cDaniel P. Fuller  aGrand Rapids, U.S.A  bWilliam B. Eerdmans Publishing Company  c1980  a217tr.  bPaperback  c21cm  aThe purpose of Fuller’s Gospel & Law is to argue against the notion of antithesis between Law and Gospel and to make a case for the fundamental continuity between Gospel and Law. According to Fuller, both Dispensational and Reformed theology posit an unbiblical discontinuity between Gospel and Law. He states that, “although today’s dispensationalism explains the relationship between law and grace in wording that is different from that of covenant theology, there is not substantial difference in meaning.  aLaw and gospel