<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Sacrifice and atonement</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <titleInfo>
    <title/>
    <subTitle>Psychological motives and Biblical patterns</subTitle>
  </titleInfo>
  <titleInfo>
    <title/>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Finlan, Stephen</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart/>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Author</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">5:2</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">Minneapolis, U.S.A</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <publisher>The Fortress</publisher>
    <dateIssued>2016</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">0 e</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">ng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <extent>234tr.</extent>
    <extent>Paperback</extent>
    <extent>23cm</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>Here, Stephen Finlan surveys psychological theories that help us to understand beliefs about sacrifice and atonement and what they may reveal about patterns of injury, guilt, shame, and appeasement. Early chapters examine the language in both testaments of purity and the scapegoat, and of payment, obligation, reciprocity, and redemption. Later chapters review theories of the origins of atonement thinking in fear and traumatic childhood experience, in ambivalent or avoidant attachment to the parents, and in poisonous pedagogy. The theories of Sandor Rado, Mary Ainsworth, Erik Erikson, and Alice Miller are examined, then Finlan draws conclusions about the moral responsibility of appropriating or rejecting atonement metaphors. His arguments bear careful consideration by all who live with these metaphors and their effects today.</abstract>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">Stephen Finlan</note>
  <subject>
    <topic>Atonement -- Biblical teaching</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="ddc">220.07</classification>
  <classification authority="ddc">S828-F51</classification>
  <identifier type="isbn">9781506401966</identifier>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">1</recordContentSource>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">2021-1</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20260119070414.0</recordChangeDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
