000			01217nam a2200289 a 4500
005			20260119070402.0
008			2021-11-22 14:08:57
020			_a0802818080
040			_a1
041			_a0 eng
082			_a230
082			_bD184-F96
100			_aFuller, Daniel P.
100			_eAuthor
245			_aGospel and law
245			_bContrast or continuum? The hermeneutics of dispensationalism and covenant theology
245			_cDaniel P. Fuller
260			_aGrand Rapids, U.S.A
260			_bWilliam B. Eerdmans Publishing Company
260			_c1980
300			_a217tr.
300			_bPaperback
300			_c21cm
520			_aThe purpose of Fuller’s Gospel & Law is to argue against the notion of antithesis between Law and Gospel and to make a case for the fundamental continuity between Gospel and Law. According to Fuller, both Dispensational and Reformed theology posit an unbiblical discontinuity between Gospel and Law. He states that, “although today’s dispensationalism explains the relationship between law and grace in wording that is different from that of covenant theology, there is not substantial difference in meaning.
650			_aLaw and gospel
957			_a211001 TKH
999			_c5820 _d5820