| 000 | 01500nam a2200289 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20260119070414.0 | ||
| 008 | 2021-12-02 10:05:29 | ||
| 020 | _a9781506401966 | ||
| 040 | _a1 | ||
| 041 | _a0 eng | ||
| 082 | _a220.07 | ||
| 082 | _bS828-F51 | ||
| 100 | _aFinlan, Stephen | ||
| 100 | _eAuthor | ||
| 245 | _aSacrifice and atonement | ||
| 245 | _bPsychological motives and Biblical patterns | ||
| 245 | _cStephen Finlan | ||
| 260 | _aMinneapolis, U.S.A | ||
| 260 | _bThe Fortress | ||
| 260 | _c2016 | ||
| 300 | _a234tr. | ||
| 300 | _bPaperback | ||
| 300 | _c23cm | ||
| 520 | _aHere, Stephen Finlan surveys psychological theories that help us to understand beliefs about sacrifice and atonement and what they may reveal about patterns of injury, guilt, shame, and appeasement. Early chapters examine the language in both testaments of purity and the scapegoat, and of payment, obligation, reciprocity, and redemption. Later chapters review theories of the origins of atonement thinking in fear and traumatic childhood experience, in ambivalent or avoidant attachment to the parents, and in poisonous pedagogy. The theories of Sandor Rado, Mary Ainsworth, Erik Erikson, and Alice Miller are examined, then Finlan draws conclusions about the moral responsibility of appropriating or rejecting atonement metaphors. His arguments bear careful consideration by all who live with these metaphors and their effects today. | ||
| 650 | _aAtonement -- Biblical teaching | ||
| 957 | _a211001 TKH | ||
| 999 |
_c5993 _d5993 |
||